Letter from the editor of the Review of Metaphysics, January 8, 2016
Email correspondence with Columbia Catholic Ministry from March 15 to August 20, 2016Email sent to Assistant Dean for Student and Family Support, August 31, 2016Letter from Department of Public Safety, September 1, 2016Email to Dean of Columbia College, September 13, 2016Email to Campus Minister of Columbia University, September 15, 2016Email to Lee Bollinger, September 22, 2016
Letter to Jane Booth, September 23, 2016Dear Ms. Booth,
In the email I sent to Mr. Bollinger, I neglected to mention another legal problem Columbia might have. As you can see from the email to Mr. Patashnick, the two students did not respond to my email even though I threatened to contact their parents. This to me indicates that the students are suffering emotional distress from what has transpired. Another thing that concerns me is that the students may not realize that I am giving a full account of my exchanges with Columbia U. on my website: http://www.newevangelist.me.
I have no doubt that the students are stressed out because it is obvious that Fr. O’Reilly, Chaplain Davis, Mr. Patashnick, and Dean Valentini are stressed out. This is why they have all involved the Department of Public Safety. Suppose you are in an emotional dispute with your neighbor over something or other. It will occur, even to the best of us, to hire a hit man to take care of the problem. No?
Very truly yours,
David Roemer
Encl:
emails dated March 16, Aug. 20, Aug. 31, Sept. 13, Sept. 22, 2016
A Developmental Lesson on the Arguments for the Existence of God
Mailed with a certificate of mailing
Email to Jewelnel Davis, October 11, 2016
Email from Diedre Fuchs. October 12, 2106
Email to Diedre Fuchs, October 12, 2016
Letter from Jane Booth, October 13, 2016Email to Diedre Fuchs, October 14, 2016Letter sent to Attorney Grievance Committee, October 18, 2016Letter from Attorney Grievance Committee, January 5, 2017
Request for Legal Assistance to New York Civil Liberties Union on January 9, 2017
Letter to New York Civil Liberties Union, January 10, 2017
Email sent to Jane Booth, January 11, 2017
Letter faxed to Attorney Grievance Committees, January 11, 2017
Email sent to Lee Bollinger, January 18, 2017
Letter faxed to Attorney Grievance Committee, January 18, 2017
Amended Complaint against Jane Booth, Lee Bollinger, and the Attorney Grievance Committee filed in the Souther District of New York on February 13, 2017
Letter to Judge Castle filed on February 24, 2017
Affidavit for Judgement by Default filed on March 17, 2017Default Judgement filed on March 17, 2017
Brief filed with the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on March 27, 2017
Letter sent to The Rutherford Institute, April 7, 2017
Request for Oral Argument on June 23, 2017
Letter to United States Attorney General on October 2, 2017
Oral Argument Before the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on January 18, 2018
Summary Order on January 30, 2018
Petition for Review En Banc on January 31, 2018
Petition for Writ of Certiorari Docket No. 17-1361
Message Posted on Facebook and LinkedIn on May 29, 2018
The U. S. Supreme Court denied my petition to review the Second Circuit's dismissal of my lawsuit against Columbia U., et. al., for violating the academic freedom of the Columbia U. community and the First Amendment (docket no. 17-1361). The matter is still pending because on March 16, 2018, I filed a Judicial Conduct Complaint with the Judicial Counsel of the Second Circuit (02-18-90028-jm) against the district judge for not signing the default judgement I filed with the district court. The basis of my allegation is that Columbia's attorney announced his appearance for Mr. Bollinger one day before the papers were served on Mr. Bollinger. In my mind, there is no evidence that Columbia U. is against my efforts to enlighten the Columbia U. community about these three bits of misinformation: 1) Human beings evolved from animals. 2) Natural selection explains the descent of animals from bacteria. 3) The cosmological argument for God's existence is based on the Big Bang. The only actor in Roemer vs. Attorney Grievance Committee, et. al., is the New York State Unified Court System, and the case is still pending before the Judicial Counsel of the Second Circuit.