Submissions to the APA Blog:
God's ExistenceEntropy and EvolutionJudicial MisconductMind-Body ProblemEmail and fax sent to APA leadershipI am writing to ask your support for my request to post a blog on the website of the American Philosophical Association about the arguments for God’s existence.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (SEP) has three lengthy entries on the arguments for God’s existence (cosmological, teleological, and ontological). None of these entries explains the correct concept of God and the rational argument for God’s existence. On December 16, 2017, Uri Nodelman sent me this email:
Thanks for your message. We take critiques of SEP entries seriously --especially if there are claims about the errors of fact (or of omission) or claims about violations of SEP guidelines seriously. At present, however, we don't know exactly which passages you find problematic. From a quick read of your linked page, it seems like you think there ought to be some citation of Etienne Gilson's work and possibly Alan Bennett's work.
Alan Bennett is a British comedian and has a series of very funny skits titled “Oxford Philosophy.” The intelligent argument in based on the scientific fact that human beings did not evolve from animals. Everyone should know and understand this argument, not just for the sake of deciding whether or not we have to pay for our sins after we die, but in order to understand history. I explain the correct argument at
https://www.academia.edu/23340072/WHY_PEOPLE_BELIEVE_GOD_CAUSED_THE_BIG_BANG Related to the pseudoscience that human beings evolved from animals is the pseudoscience that natural selection explains biological evolution, not just adaptation. I’m trying to get the
American Journal of Physics to retract an absurd article, titled “Entropy and Evolution,” promoting this pseudoscience. See:
https://www.academia.edu/20939526/An_Analogy_Between_Nazi_Germany_and_the_United_States I gave oral argument to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in connection with my First Amendment lawsuit against Columbia University for refusing my offer to give a lecture/lesson about God’s existence. It is on the court's website (Oral Arguments, 17-818, January 18, 2018). The U. S. Supreme Court denied my petition to review the Second Circuit's dismissal (docket no 17-1361). However, there is pending a misconduct complaint I filed against the district judge who dismissed my lawsuit.
Very truly yours, David Roemer
http://www.newevangelization.info
Email sent to Full Members of the APA:As a full member of the American Philosophical Association, you are implicated in the APA’s decision not to publish the attached submission to https://blog.apaonline.org. This submission explains why 11 quotes about the mind-body problem are misleading and misinformed according to modern Thomism. The APA’s conduct is analogous to the decision of the American Journal of Physics to publish an absurd article about biological evolution and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The AJP is promoting the pseudoscience that natural selection explains, not just the adaptation of species to the environment, but common descent. My attempts to get the AJP to retract the article are here:
https://www.academia.edu/20939526/An_Analogy_Between_Nazi_Germany_and_the_United_StatesYour organization is promoting misinformation about the mind-body problem because there is an argument for God’s existence based on an intelligent and knowledgeable understanding of what a human being is. You CANNOT find this argument in the three lengthy entries about God’s existence in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. I explain this here:
https://www.academia.edu/23340072/WHY_PEOPLE_BELIEVE_GOD_CAUSED_THE_BIG_BANGVery truly yours, David Roemer
http://www.newevangelization.info
Correspondence and record of emails and faxes sent to 2,641 members of the American Philosophical Association